Tuesday 6 December 2011

Why to Vote for PML(N)?


By the end of June 1999, Pakistan Army was facing defeat at Kargil Hills. Its supply line was under the bombing of Indian Air Force. PAF could not intervene as Pakistan officially never owned Kargil fighters.  If PAF would have gone for rescue operation of Kargil Fighters, there was the possibility of all-out war between Pakistan & India as PAF & Pakistan Navy was not ready for all-out war operationally & mentally as they were never taken into confidence about Kargil Operation. Indian forces were advancing very fast in Kargil, they were claiming front after front, hill after hill & Pakistan Army was without food & ammunition. Pakistan army had suffered more casualties than the combined casualties of 1965 & 1971 war front losses on a single front of Kargil. The situation was getting worse & worse. A shameful surrender was heading towards Pakistan army. Everything seemed lost.  

When Generals, air marshals & admirals failed, it came to then prime minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif. He took it onto himself & converted that certain military defeat into a political withdrawal. He did not let the moral & confidence of the nation lose in its armed forces compromising his own popularity. To this day majority of Pakistanis still think that Pakistan Army was in very strong position & Nawaz Sharif backed off from Kargil on US pressure. I was also one of those until I came across this by reading a research book in 2009 “Ghaddar Kon” By a very credible journalist Suhail Warraich. 

I was the lover of Imran Khan at those times, when I came to know about Kargil reality. It boosted Nawaz Sharif’s  respect in my heart exponentially which was already at some higher level due to Nawaz Sharif’s role in the lawyers movement for Judges restoration.

This book further motivated me to research on Nawaz Sharif’s two eras as prime minister and when I researched from internet, some political history books, I was quite impressed with the fact that in every era of Nawaz Sharif as Prime Minister, all the indicators of Pakistan economy were positive. Pakistan was leading south Asia in many fields & those cannot be covered in one article.

But as a supporter & follower of Imran Khan, I was more concerned about two things about any leader
US Slavery: Whether or not a leader can withstand US pressure or broadly cpeaking international pressure on the matters of our national interest?
Corruption: A leader with no corruption (financial) at all

With great respect of Nawaz Sharif in my heart, I needed to evaluate him on the above described two standards. First Can Nawaz Sharif with stand super power’s pressure for the national interest of Pakistan? I had my answers.

International pressure handling without confrontation
USA wanted to invade Afghanistan on the issue of Usama capture or kill accusing Usama  for Nairoobi Blasts on US Embassy killing 250 persons including dozens of US citizens in august 1998. USA even fired twenty Cruise missiles from its naval fleet on Afghanistan to target Usama & those missiles violated Aerial territory of Pakistan. Nawaz Sharif took the strong notice with it & talked with USA & Taliban government at the same time & USA was left with no option but to come on table without any further offensive due to Nawaz Sharif's diplomacy.

And who can forget Nawaz Sharif’s brave handling of international pressure on the issue of Nuclear Test in May 1998. Here one thing was to be noticed that Nawaz Sharif did not over react, he gave UN enough time to act on Indian Blasts when UNO failed to make India an Example of horror Nawaz Sharif decided to answer India on the same ground countering all the international pressure. Even US president said to Nawaz Sharif “Mr. Prime Minister! If I were at you place, I would have done the same”. And because of Nawaz Sharif’s diplomacy Pakistan was not isolated in the world. Green passport respect increased suddenly exponentially particularly in Muslim World.

Similarly Nawaz Sharif went against the will of international powers on the issue of Musharaf Indemnity, Long march & NRO issues. Covering all these issues is beyond the perspectives of this article

Is Nawaz Sharif a Corruption Free Leader

It took Musharaf 28 days to file first case against Nawaz Sharif post Oct, 12, 1999 military coup and that case was plane hijacking case and that was not filed from any passenger or pilot in fact an inspector of ISI filed that. Musharaf regime could not find a single trace of corruption. There is not even single case of corruption filed against Nawaz Sharif. Hudaibia paper Mills, Money Laundering etc are just the blames not the cassis. Musharaf regime initiated the investigations but could never make the case out of those investigations. With only one thing left in my mind about Nawaz Sharif was the scheme “Qarz Utaro Mulk Sanwaro” Scheme. I had the answer in the following link

This is the link to the 8th chapter of the official annual report of stat bank 2000/2001. Starting from the 11th page of this chapter are the details of Qarz Utaro Mulk Sanwaro Scheme. You can find there is everything is transparent & clean about this scheme.


I concluded that what Imran Khan promises to do in the future Nawaz Sharif has already delivered that in the past. So I thought why to support fantasy, why not to support the facts. Pakistan cannot afford experimentation any further. Pakistan needs a tested person or party and that person is PML(N) chief Nawaz Sharif who qualifies every single criteria of being a leader.

Beside this PML(N) has so many social, economic, diplomatic, cultural & so many other achievements which can not be covered in one article.

Now with all due respect to my captain Imran Khan, I decided to support PML-N more actively than I used to support PTI & it was the end of 2009.

I urge all of my country fellows first to research the history with open mind. Pakistan is at a very critical stage of the history. This is the final battle for the survival Pakistan. Please DO NOT make stance by talk shows or blame game. Study your yesterday & take proper stances today to have a better tomorrow other wise

Daastaan Takk na Hogi Daastaano Me..


JazakAllah

72 comments:

  1. Very well written...i think now PTI friends will get to know about many unveiling questions regarding Nawaz Sharif and PMLn...

    ReplyDelete
  2. @ Adnan, you talk about facts, the real facts...i also wanna join PMLN..thanks for opening my eyes...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hope this serves as an eye-opener for other PTI supporters too...!

    ReplyDelete
  4. agar real may history ke research ho gaiy ya aap sb logo nay parh le than may b aap sb nawaz league ko farigh karwa do gay is liay agar unaware he raho us ke kartoot say than behter hai.......agar phir b dil na manay than start form his first entrance in politics,,,,pata karna k kis tarah jamaat ka qayaam hua,,isi kia cheez thee,zia ul haq nay mia shareef ko kia offer kia,,,clinton k pas kaun gaya kargil ke jung ka mokay par,yellow cab scheme par kitna paisa loota gaya,supreme court par hamla kis nay karwaya,,itfak foundaries k corruption,,sro kaisay issue hua aik din k liay,,khawajah shareef ko kaisay khareeda gaya for the lahore highcour cj,,,hudaibia paper mill scandal,,bop scandal,,money laundering cases,,ayesha ahad malik,,kim parker scandal,,,yar kuch tehkeek akrna aur plz aware karna ..aur phir sochna k kia wakai may vote karna chahye k nh,,aur ha yaad aya party ko yateem kar k khud saudia bhaagna aik agreement aur maafi nama sign kar k....wa g wa.....leader ho to aisa k wakt anay par mulk say bhaag jaiy......mia g bye bye,
    still asking y y

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ osman...i wud just say...tabiyat theek nahi lagti aap ki...if wat u r saying is right then...Imran Khan wud be a much much bigger criminal if he doesn't take Mian sb to court!
    n lagta hae aap ne hisaab Allah nahi Imran Khan ko dena hae!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wah meray dost, aap ki aakhri baat sun kar to mujhy bohot ziada khushu hui...,

      "lagta hae aap ne hisaab Allah nahi Imran Khan ko dena hae!"

      I think yeh baat aaap nai zehni-deewaliyapan ki wajah sai ki hia.., koi SAMAJHDAR MUSLIM aisa fuzool joke bhe nahi karay ga....,

      Delete
  6. Thats why we all love Pakistan Muslim League.....Nawaz Sharif Zindaabad.....
    Very well written

    ReplyDelete
  7. that article reflects the reality i will add on here by saying that mian nawaz sharif is the only leader fighting for civilian led foreign policy,civilian led democracy and the only leader who wants to get the defence budget passed from the Perliament so one must vote for mian nawaz sharif sahab also for these reasons

    ReplyDelete
  8. Passing the defence budget from the perliament can expose some hidden realities

    ReplyDelete
  9. Owais.. Covering all the reasons to vote for nawaz Sharif is not possible in one article.. Even its summary will be too lengthy for the readers so I had to restrict myself to only few out of too many.
    Thanks for your feed back.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Billo g. It will be better if you can kindly elaborate the actions of 10 years of his stay in Saudia that what he has done for his nation in this period. Why he as left them alone. Also do you have any good answer to these 4 years of criminal silence of AZ government?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Very well written!!
    Thanks for reminding us about Kargil.

    His economic development and long-term vision could bring wonders to our nation. Too bad, we always fall for fancy words. And not read between the lines or look for actions. He has delivered, as promised.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Allah will help mian sahab cox he knowx better

    ReplyDelete
  13. Mian Saab jaan deyoo Saddi Wari aan deyoo!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Shatee.. "waari" is not begged, it is earned through public campaign.. So better come up with some solid reforms program rather than just blame game (actually you did not blame but the person who said "Saadi Waari Aan deyo" his total politics is blame based)..

    ReplyDelete
  15. very well adan..my family is part of PMLN..BUT i was supporter of IK..but i have realized that IK has taken u-turn..on facts and figures i can say it surely that only Nawaz shareef can lead pak in better way..he is the real leader..

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Only problem with Imran Khan is that he is the most confused politician this time in Pakistan. He himself is not clear that what exactly he wants. When ever I have listened him I have heard typical, lifeless and repeated sentences which looks like someone asked him to memories those sentences and say gain and again like parrot. He has no vision and above all he is to much self centered and self praising person. In his dictionary only he the angel rest all are dawns.

    ReplyDelete
  17. IK is consistently blaming Nawaz Sharif. Nawaz Sharif never indulged in any scandal of money minting. He belongs to business family and borne with silver spoon but he has spirit for the welfare of country. No one can suspect on his honesty and patriotism.

    ReplyDelete
  18. well Nawaz Sharif is so good because he pays all his taxes, he don't have any property, mills or business that's why paying tax only 5000. He got the strongest Parliament what he did?? where he utilized that power??? Why he left Pakistan? Why he join PPP government? What the hell he was doing in first 3 years by supporting Zardari Govt. ??? he is corrupt like Zardari. Why his brother let that basted Raman Devis go??? their are many more I too have lot of articles to tell the real face of Nawaz Sharif.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Adnan Akhtar
    A typical sweeping statements in PTI style, I guess you better need to know the facts than comment here.. You have listed so many baseless allegations, inshAllah I'll also post articles to clear your allegations.
    Cheers..

    ReplyDelete
  20. oh please dont give us bullshitt...were you there to see that all. I am from the army family 80% of my family are n forces....For your kind information Our army got a hold on Idian Army and we were almost done on them...then Mr Nawz Sharif was called by Clinton and he was given the instruction to take off our army and of course servant had to obay the instructions and thats hpw we lost it. Please dont tell the people wrong stories when you dont have any thing good to say for these thieves

    ReplyDelete
  21. Oh please...belonging to an 'army family'doesn't mean u know things...n sir..u seem to know nothing...
    waise...serving in an army lead by a traitor like musharraf is nothing to be proud of...rather a shame!
    Gen zinni himself has written down clearly in his book that musharraf forced mian sb to go to clinton to plead an end to the war...and mian sb wasn't willing to...
    what more???
    it was mian sb's greatness that...for sake of Pakistan's honour, he took everything on himself...! that's a leader!
    n if u know anything about kargil...u must be knowing that how many lives got Mian sb saved...otherwise it was a duck hunt...otherwise too, our men wud have died of hunger...coz of the traitor mush...
    the post mortem of the bodies revealed that our shaheed men had been LITERALLY eating grass for days...
    plz don't get carried away by mush + Ik propaganda...

    ReplyDelete
  22. you seem like a good researcher. here are some more questions for you.

    1. What is Nawaz view about article 6 for Zia ul Haq? Would he pursue it?

    2. Zardari took out pk money into swiss banks. How much did Nawaz take out to London to buy expensive flats? and how did he take this money out of Pakistan? There is no legal trace of this? Did he use Hundi?

    3. Why did Nawaz Sharif leave Tehrik e Istaklal and joined Zia Ul Haq? Does that make him less of a lota than Chaudry Pervaiz Ilahi of PMLQ? One did it for Zia and other did it for Musharraf? So how is one better than other?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Dear Author,

    Learn how to write some sentences in english, or use urdu.

    PS I hope at least you got paid for this one ..

    ReplyDelete
  24. lolz.. these gimmicks are not gonna work this time around.. I think that the writer of this pathetic article, should have included the deal that the government of PMLn did with that blood sucking IMF in 1997, and a leader is a nothing more than a failure, once he/she fails to put his/ her's country's house in order and pursues the easy way, i.e the IMF. Zardari government also pursued this easy way in 2008, just like Nawaz sharif did in 1997. So in conclusion, both of them have the same economic policy, i.e to rely on foreign dole, rather than making in house reforms. This is not the only thing that indicates the failed policies of nawaz. There are also many others like attack on supreme court,the Kargil fiasco, etc, but the IMF deal is the most worth mentioning, because it reflects the failed vision that Mr nawaz sharif has for Pakistan...alas!!!!............ and oh!!.. If anyone wants to know that terms and condition of that 1997 IMF's dole, please watch the following link, which is the press release of the IMF of october, 1997: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/1997/pr9748.htm

    ReplyDelete
  25. Umer
    I know there are some spelling & proposition mistakes in my blog, inshAllah in next blogs I am going to improve this. I wish some one pay to me for this article, so far not a single penny I have earned. :D

    ReplyDelete
  26. Tayyab Rashid
    Let me answer your questions point by point.
    1.Article 6 about Ziaulhaq, it can not be as Paliament has given indemnity to his actions.
    2. Zardari Looted money yes, & PML-N initiated the cases, which were compromised under NRO but Shahbaz Sharif again filed a petition after the restoration of judiciary against NRO to open those cases & that case has been decided in favor of the petitioner. If you have any proof of money laundering about PML-N you must go to court. To my best knowledge The business of Sharif family was started with very low initial capital with loans from UK banks. If you have documented proofs otherise, share it. DO NOT only talk, take some actions like PML-N.
    3. Interestting, you poininting to Tehreek-e-Istqlaal, so did Nawaz Sharif broke the party.. Was he a prominent politician? This is some thing loser mentality at its peak. He was an industrialist at those times & had anti bhutto emotions due to nationalization so it was very natural for him to join any strong anti Bhutto element & ever since that industriast became a seasoned politician, he never looked at establishment.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Zia..
    Try to look at things in a broader view. Pakistan was rated second in corruption when Nawaz Sharif took the oath of Prime minister in 1997. Pakistan was on the verge of default so it was inevitable to get immediate breathing air however Nawaz Sharif also started "Qarz Utaro, Mulk Sawaro Scheme" to counter this in long term & that scheme was so much transparent that State Bank of Pakista admired this scheme in its official annual report of 2000/2001. Remember,Nawaz Sharif was in prison during those times when the audit of this scheme was being conducted & Musharaf was desperate to file cases against him. Kindly DO NOT isolate things from the broader picture.
    JazakAllah

    ReplyDelete
  28. Adyhallmark
    inshAllah as soon as Nawaz Sharif comes into power a commission on Kargil will be constituted to fix the responsible. Until then you can enjoy the following interview
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TohR-kQv0l8

    ReplyDelete
  29. What should we expect from Nawaz Sharif? I am surprised that you are expecting so much from him...what has he done in his years of rule?
    He increased his wealth in those times though this guy his boats ready all the time foreign bank accounts, multiple foreign apartments, houses...if he sneezes he goes to UK for checkup...Do you think this guy even have a trust in his own country?? I am surprised with the educated people like you...how does your mind accept ppl like him. He is no one to me to like him or hate him...but man see what has he done to this country...see his own attitude. in the past when he needed Army then army was good..today when he doesnt need them..they are bad. For Kargal man dont tell me all that I know commanders personally who were there in mountains and I know very well what happened...dont give free credit to Nawaz Sharif for any thing rather he was the reason of all that lost. and by the way you think the comission he would make would giuve decision against him?? Please think of Pakistan dont go into the favor of persons tested people.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Adyhallmark
    Why you are so confused.. You speaking out of just here & there without any concrete point. One request is to you is to come up with some solid point & please don't lie just to score political points. Kargil was failed operation, that is the established fact. Whether you accept it or reject it, facts remain the same. Do you know the name of that group which was involved in Kargil Operation? You know the commanders who were there then ask them how many casualties on both sides? what kind of weapons were used from both sides? what were India's limitations & what were Pakistani limitations? What you know? tell me ,.. then I'll come up with the exact statistics
    .. come up with solid information not with hypothetical assumption if your are to deny the facts...

    ReplyDelete
  31. Well I am not confused but you got frustrated as every one is opposing your fake struggle here...
    I dont know what you have been told to achieve or if this is paid or not...but trust me boy those times have gone now when one could play with words. You cant face the reality thats why it sounds to you here and there. I can give you the every single detail of what you are asking I am surprised what established fact you are talking about or what book you are following...this is not important that what kind of weapon were used or how many attacks were made what is important is the RESULT. you are telling me what you have read!! I am telling what my family members have seen by their own eyes so better dont talk to me about the facts you are rather going through theoretical assumptions and you just wana follow sharif family blindly. And boy I am not in politics neither I am defending any politician here...so what political points I would make here in this unknown blog? you better see who is confused now.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Adyhallmark
    Its quite evident from your post that you are just talking on perception.. not on reality.. but any way I would like to say that

    Curse of Allah be on the liars.. Al Quran

    ReplyDelete
  33. These pathetic political mafias fail to understand that these gimmicks will not work any more.
    (A million dollar statement from Imran Khan and a shear point to ponder for all the people supporting these political mafias)

    "Chaudary Nisar jitni marzi koshish kar lay lekin PML-N ki leader ship Sharif khandan ko hi millay gi".

    And seriously this writer is another one of those show boys of PML-N

    ReplyDelete
  34. Al-MAL
    Was there any election to appoint SM Qureshi the vice Chairman of PTI? Can imran Khan order SM Qureshi to scrap the gaddi nasheeni syatem? What you talking about? Once I used to Imran Khan's fan but gradually I turned against him because of his hyper politics & now that he has shaken hands with establishment & accepting rejected lotad in PTI every now & then. Adding insult to injury these lotas are straight away being appointed at the key designations of the party.
    You must have the courage to tolerate difference of opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I challenge that Imran Khan's decline has been started and the people who joined him blindly would soon realize they made a wrong decision in hurry. The time, Imran Khan's target is Nawaz Sharif and PMLN who has popularity more than others among Awam and had never openly and critically talked about PPP-the looters, MQM- the Killers, ANP-the Pashtoon nation's sellers, PMLQ-the Musharraf supporters. this could be easily judged when you think neutrally. Nawaz Sharif isn't as much bad guy than above-mentioned corrupt and characterless politicians rather he is far better than these and even Imran Khan. that's why one could say he was not here with his own agenda instead working for someone sabotaging vote bank of rightist forces.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Zahoor Hassan..
    yes that's a very strong point

    ReplyDelete
  37. Mr Adnan what kind of evidences you are providing here that you are saying I am talking on assumptions ??

    Place in Riwind assumption?

    Escaping from Pakistan to Saudia ..assumption?

    Foreign Accounts, properties.. assumptions?

    Using Government resources (shown on TV) for their own Flop Jalsas...Assumptions?

    Attack on supreme court in the past.. assumption?

    1992 Economic reform of not giving tax on foregin earning..assumption?

    Now since you wouldnt have any thing to say on these...you will say I am confused. And be careful of using Quranic Ayah these are very delicate things.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think the writer should listen this Interview of our Greatest Hero AQ Khan about Nuclear Test...
    Listen carefully after (4.30).
    you are saying "
    International pressure handling without confrontation" and see what our Hero is saying about this... Plz Must see and open your eyes...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zOuXpapjCQ8#!

    I am not supporting any one... But My hero can't lie.

    ReplyDelete
  39. MINDHUNTER
    Kindly read again. A leader is not supposed to share every thing with every one. He gave time to International community to judge the reaction over Indian tests. & Dr Khan talking of the meeting on may 20. This was the probation time for IC to react but when nawaz Sharif saw no significant reaction, he was left with no choice but to replt india in the same coins.. Kindly set your records straight.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Mr Adnan...... Please tell me, how long u PPP and PML-N are gonna blame on previous governments for for ur failures and actions?? I expected that u will blame benazir led government's corruption for the IMF trance of 1997 for Nawaz sharif's government. Not so surprisingly, PPP-led government also blames musharraf every now and then for the ills in the country. I mean for how long???... when we are gonna put our hose in order??... And just to inform u, 1997 trance was not the only one that IMF injected to us; it also did the same on May 25, 1999. The following is the press release of it: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/nb/1999/nb9923.htm

    ReplyDelete
  41. Mr Adnan.... The nuclear tests, Kargil war, etc are very debatable topics and i must say that u have put up a very good argument in those regards. But, it is the fact that a leader is considered a failed one, once he/she fails to make required economic reforms in his/her's country and looks for foreign doles from international organizations, like IMF, and it is on the record that both Mr zardari and Mr nawaz sharif pursued this path of begging from international community, which reflects that both have the same economic vision for the country. I, as a patriotic Pakistani, want my country to get free from the shackles of this accursed aid and for that, i am willing to try an untested leader, who is promising to do this job for the country. It doesn't make any sense to me to try Mr Nawaz sharif again, hoping that this time he might will do something different, which can make pakistan free from the curse of aid. At the end of the day, it is ur choice, if u still want to give Mr nawaz sharif another chance, but u should know one thing that: "it is foolishness to try the same thing again and again and hoping for different result"...I hope my thoughts would not hurt ur feelings. May Allah (SWT) enable us to decide best for our country. Amin...:D

    ReplyDelete
  42. zia..
    I would like to recommend you to take the circumstances of 1997 into account.. Pakistan was rated second in corruption & was on the verge of being default.. So Pakistan needed immediate breathing air. You got to look at things in broader view rather than isolated view. if Nawaz Sharif were given a full term of five year the situation would have been quite different. I remember that at those times there was no inflation, no load shedding & no such unemployment in Pakistan despite the worst sanctions imposed on Pakistan as a consequence of nuclear blasts. Kindly be realistic before giving sweeping statements. i am not ready to experiment with my country Pakistan, we need an experienced person. And the new person must show some agenda & experienced team rather than blame game & tsunami of rejected lotas.

    ReplyDelete
  43. 100 % Agree , Infact Nawaz Shrif is the only leader who did practically break USA begging bowl and did start to return Pakistan IMF loans !! Had his govt not been toppled in 1999, Pakistan would have been a loan-free state till now !!

    ReplyDelete
  44. GDP rate of Pakistan was 13.1 % in 1999, in spite of all the sanctions imposed by USA, World Bank, EU etc after successful Nuclear Tests !!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Nawaz Sharif is offering huge Money for writting these type of Fake Article....I hve also being offered Money coz i am running vry successful group on Facebook.......I asked one question from all of you...agr Nawaz Sharif ne itni hi taraqi kr di thi toh humain us waqt q nazar nahi ayi...Yeh sb jhoot hai...awam ko aik aur dafa bewakof banay ki sazish hai....PMLN ki tarif sirf wohi banda kr skta hai..jis ne Nawaz sharif dour me khob faida authya ho..Yani haram ka khaya ho......

    ReplyDelete
  46. Adhi..
    Kindly give me the contact of that person who offered you money so that I can offer my sevices to that person. Any way, I would like to say to you that
    Jhoot Bolnay waalay pe Khuda ki Lanat.. Aameen

    ReplyDelete
  47. Adnan butt.. lolz.... Immediate breather??...PPP government said the same thing in 2008, but kept on taking loans after loan. U could have justified the first loan by saying this, but the second tranche of May 1999 reflects that, relying on foreign loans was the only policy left for Nawaz sharif government, just like it is of PPP's government right now and i don't think so that after failing for first 2.5 years in government, he could have turned things around in the next 2.5 years, had the martial law was not in forced...

    ReplyDelete
  48. green heart...13.1% in 1999??.. wow!!.. Even china has never reached this mark, but I hope some day, Pakistan will reach it. But, u should know that the GDP growth in 1999 was only 3.7%. Following link shows the historical graph of Pakistan's gdp growth. Move ur cursor to the graph on 1999. http://www.google.ca/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=ny_gdp_mktp_kd_zg&idim=country:PAK&dl=en&hl=en&q=pakistan+gdp+growth

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dr Chaudhry...i'll reply ur essay points one by one. Firstly, Dr Aq khan did not said that "IK does not have any political sense", but he just repeated the stance of our media, ie "imran khan has no electables" and Dr Aq khan has also clarified his stance on Imran khan and has called him a "dynamic leader and a well wisher of the country". The following link is what i am talking about. Press CTRL+F and type "dynamic" to find these saying of Dr Aq khan. http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=80840&Cat=9

    ReplyDelete
  50. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  51. "what their plan is whats there agenda is they seem to be confused stressed no direction no dimension no plan no arguement end of each arguement is abusive language.. corruption and so on .".....Dr Chaudhry, what else plan is needed, other than proper tax collection and controlling corruption???...What has nawaz sharif done in this regard in his last two tenures, other than begging from the IMF and making pakistan a bankrupt country by 1999???. Now a days, we see Nawaz sharif repeating the same stances of Imran khan about tax collection and controlling corruption, but I, as a human being, will naturally incline more towards Imran khan's vision than nawaz sharif, because i have tested nawaz sharif by giving him two chances and has seen him failed miserably in achieving both these goals; the reflection of this failure can be found out by studying the economic indicators of Pakistan in 1999, when we were virtually a bankrupt country!!!

    ReplyDelete
  52. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  53. "House raiwind its inherited property why this house never discussed by IK when he was begging for plots"..Dr chaudhry..... Inherited or no inherited, all i want to see is the source of income from which it was built and from which it is being run. I mean how can u run such a big state, when ur factories, which are the major source of income of Sharif family, are on default??..I mean how can u live such a lavish life, when u are not even able to pay bills for ur businesses???... why not make a cut in your personal expenditures then??? ...point to ponder.... And for the IK's "begging of plot from sharif", i don't think so that it is worth to discuss it any further, as the plot was gifted by mr sharif himself to IK on being man of the series and the written application was the part of the awarding process, of which documents are being provided to media now. If u PML-N folks does no agree with it, then u can "go to court"!!!!!..:D

    ReplyDelete
  54. Dr Chaudhry..... the rest of ur essay starting from " Still beating about the bush escape to saudia..... to...... the anchor minister in musharaf cabinet nothing else i would say" is a very tricky part, because it includes controversial topics like Money laundering and deal with mushy. Off course, as a follower of Mr Sharif, u will try ur best to defend him in these issues as well, but i will be more willing to listen the views of neutral anchors like Kashrif abbasi (no mubashar luckman :P) and the BBC documentary, which completely exposed the money laundering. The links of which are as below.
    1:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLh9OtoWJC4 (kashif abbasi's view)
    2:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wXCpQYNg2s
    ^^^(BBC's documentary on money laundering)
    and u cannot say me that "go to court", because there are already tons of references pending against Nawaz sharif in NAB. The details of which are in the following link: http://nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Islamabad/20-Oct-2011/3-NAB-references-inquiries-pending-against-Sharifs

    ReplyDelete
  55. Zia,
    I had to delete your few of the posts just to make this comment rally look reasonable (sorry for that)..
    all you are doing is just coming up with swwping statements. You asking for PML-N Agenda.. boy, what is Imran Khan's agenda other than blame game? What is his team other than rejected lotas? And you asking about the source of income of Sharif family.. That family own 17 industries. They have always been top industrialist group of Pakistan long before this family entered in politics. You sharing youtube documentaries.. A typical loser approach. You jut relying on media reports. Get a life.. Search the facts propely before you comment..
    Be reasonable.

    ReplyDelete
  56. PTI was used to one way propaganda on social media.. but now they have started to feel the heat just by the counter attack of PML(N) volunteers.. I just think what would happen to PTI fans if PML(N) starts to do it at party level?

    ReplyDelete
  57. If they (haters of pmln) only consider that musharaf was biggest enemy of pmln even he could not find anything against him then how could that be even consider as real ? or i have to say that those who are blaming nawaz sharif have access to Loh-e-Mehfooz so that have ultimate knowledge of real facts !! do they have access ? if not then even very little research gave me idea that nawaz sharif was right every single time. but they (same they as above)will never accept because they dont want to. its easy to wake up a sleeping person but its impossible to wake a person who is pretending to sleep.
    May ALLAH(SWT) always guide us to right path and always give us ability to be with right peoples.

    ReplyDelete
  58. 9 Titles You Get If You Don’t Support Imran Khan ~ (My own Experience of Political Discussions)

    http://adnan.chohdry.com/9-titles-you-get-if-you-dont-support-imran-khan/

    ReplyDelete
  59. I haven't seen a bigger idiot then Nawaz Sharif, as Zardari showed us time and time again in last few years

    Only major blunders since 1998 have been listed:

    Zardari and Nawaz league are the same person with similar objectives under the sindhi and Punjabi mask.

    NS: Nawaz Sharif:

    1. NS didn’t removed COAS after Kargil war.
    2. Prime minister’s own intelligence failed badly in kargil war.
    3. The international media war was badly lost by NS after kargil
    4. NS supported the attack on Supreme court
    5. NS appointed Pervaiz Musharaf (Gen PM) by removing JK and superseding 4 senior generals.
    6. NS removed Gen PM when he was out of country
    7. NS appointed ISI chief as COAS. (World over never have an engineering corp. man made COAS before)
    8. NS fled the country after quo. Captains drown with their ships
    9. Signed an agreement with Gen PM by not coming to Pakistani politics for 10 years
    10. Decided to boycott the election in 2008 in all party conference after BB died. Even BB’s party didn’t boycotted
    11. Took a U turn on boycott and ran the elections
    12. Only stood his candidates in Urban north Punjab. And Hazara. Even dist. Like Mandi Bahuddin and few places in FSD were ignored by him
    13. He didn’t even tried to get any candidates in Baluchistan, Sind and south Punjab. Making himself a north Punjab party
    14. Made an alliance with Zardari whose character he knew for 30 years at the time of elections
    15. Long march U turn before Gujranwala
    16. Supported the zardari league for 3 years
    17. Went to Sindh in 2011 didn’t meet any sindhi leaders there
    18. Arranged a flop jalsa recently on 28 Oct to disrupt PTI.
    19. Didn’t even came to his own Lahore jalsa. SS made a mess of it
    20. Copied PTI in FSD jalsa. The movement was called go zardari go, majorly blamed PTI
    21. After the FSD jalsa failed due to many empty seats http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2FfyPIUDDA cancelled the Gujranwala.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Only major blunders since 1998 have been listed:

    Zardari and Nawaz league are the same person with similar objectives under the sindhi and Punjabi mask.

    NS: Nawaz Sharif:

    1. NS didn’t removed COAS after Kargil war.
    2. Prime minister’s own intelligence failed badly in kargil war.
    3. The international media war was badly lost by NS after kargil
    4. NS supported the attack on Supreme court
    5. NS appointed Pervaiz Musharaf (Gen PM) by removing JK and superseding 4 senior generals.
    6. NS removed Gen PM when he was out of country
    7. NS appointed ISI chief as COAS. (World over never have an engineering corp. man made COAS before)
    8. NS fled the country after quo. Captains drown with their ships
    9. Signed an agreement with Gen PM by not coming to Pakistani politics for 10 years
    10. Decided to boycott the election in 2008 in all party conference after BB died. Even BB’s party didn’t boycotted
    11. Took a U turn on boycott and ran the elections
    12. Only stood his candidates in Urban north Punjab. And Hazara. Even dist. Like Mandi Bahuddin and few places in FSD were ignored by him
    13. He didn’t even tried to get any candidates in Baluchistan, Sind and south Punjab. Making himself a north Punjab party
    14. Made an alliance with Zardari whose character he knew for 30 years at the time of elections
    15. Long march U turn before Gujranwala
    16. Supported the zardari league for 3 years
    17. Went to Sindh in 2011 didn’t meet any sindhi leaders there
    18. Arranged a flop jalsa recently on 28 Oct to disrupt PTI.
    19. Didn’t even came to his own Lahore jalsa. SS made a mess of it
    20. Copied PTI in FSD jalsa. The movement was called go zardari go, majorly blamed PTI
    21. After the FSD jalsa failed due to many empty seats http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2FfyPIUDDA cancelled the Gujranwala.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haris kamal .........prime minister NS removed musharaf and made Zia ud din butt the new army chief but he couldnt make it to GHQ and other generals, gen aziz and gen usmani launched coup de tat......when mushi was in srilanka and he was dismissed by PM because of Kargil incident .......Those bloody idiots generals didnt want any investigations about kargil. all is factual so this type of question is stupid and yes he fled what do you want frm politicians in those kind of situations either killed like Mr Bhutto or accept the Jilla watani ......he was in jail for about a year ....u moron that s why people all over the world call us a stupid nation .......investigate these allegations properly and you will come to know that these are baseless....IK using this only for its own benefit

      Delete
  61. Haris Kamal..
    A typical loser sweeping statements..

    ReplyDelete
  62. Over all PML (N) did a lot for Pakistan. There is no voice which is based on SOOBAIAT in Punjab while other parties do it on broder level.

    ReplyDelete
  63. mian jee the only leader to lead pakistan to a prosperous future

    ReplyDelete
  64. The problem I have with PML-N is that it is sort of a heridary party, with power almost certainly being handed to the next generation of Shareefs: Mariyam Nawaz or Hamza Shabaz.
    Also, the thing is that the Shareefs have made a lot of money, and much of their money is outside Pakistan, meaning they have less of a stake in Pakistan's betterment, beacuse alot of their assets sit outside Pakistan. In Israel, and in many other (western) democracies, you cannot hold public office until you have declare all your (financial) assets sit in that country.
    Nawaz Shareef has also shown inclination to openly compromise with (corrupt) PPP on many matters. It has (thus) also acted as a 'friendly' opposition.
    PML-N has also failed on many fronts, such as the the empowement of poor at the basic levels. The highest suicide rate in Pakistan is in Lahore, PML-N's power-base.
    Nawaz Shareef sought to save his skin, and fleed from Pakistan when Musharraf ousted him, leaving the people of Pakistan at the mercy of a usurper:(
    PML-N also does not have a credible system of intra-party elections. The Shareefs, or their family/friends hold all the important party positions. Tickets for election are also alotted according to the Shareefs' will, not in a systemic way.
    Nawaz Shareef also has allegation of taxevasion etc. For e.g., in 2008, he payed only 5000 Rs/- in taxes (and he proudly/openly talked about it):(
    Nawaz Shareef/PML-N were started with the blessings of dictator General Zia-Ul-Haq, through General Jillani, martial law administrator of the Punjab. Nawaz Shareef/PML-N have been in power intermittently six times, and they did not do what they could do; they are tried and tested.
    Imran Khan/PTI are yet to be elected in major numbers, to the high seats of power, so we do not do wether or not they'll deliver beforehand ( and I believe they will...!), so that is left to be tried. Vote then for PTI...!:)

    ReplyDelete
  65. I would just comment on one line " what Imran Khan promises to do in the future Nawaz Sharif has already delivered that in the past." . So that means that we have already been developed enough, and we dont need any betterment now? Yea? That exactly what is status quo, opposing change. And you know very much what is the situation in the country and in Punjab at the moment after 25 years of N-League rule in Punjab. The top two most corrupt department in the country ,as per Transparency International report are police and Land Revenue, both under provincial government of Shahbaz sharif. 59% government schools are dysfunctional (no water , no electricity, no toilet, no teachers). After 25 years of rule on punjab, health sector, which is a provincial matter is in front of us. Crime rate increase in Punjab per year 109% (highest in Pakistan) If this is what Nawaz Sharif has already done, and we dont need any more betterment, then I am speechless. I dont want such development

    ReplyDelete
  66. as a supporter & follower of Imran Khan, I am more concerned about two things about any leader
    US Slavery:
    Corruption:

    I don't agree with your arguments bro, anyhow, nice attempt...
    May be you heard Dr. A.Q khan's statement regarding Atomic Bomb test and NS stance on it.
    and if you think he'z a brave man, then em sorry my frnd you must check the AGREEMENT oF NS WITH P.MUSHARRAF,,,,

    as far as Corruption cases concerns, dear frnd dont forget NRO, and same thing happened in case of NS, it was all part of the deal with Musharraf that he won't open those corruption cases...,

    last thing, if you are supporter of PMLN , then dont need to give explanations....

    ReplyDelete